On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > Are you going to gauge it roughly from python-dev feedback, or should > we take a more formal vote on python-committers once the PEP has > settled?
I'll not take a formal vote unless the discussion suggests there's a lot of pushback. So far I've seen very little. >> The PEP tries to spell out some gray areas but I'm sure there will be >> others; that's life. Do note that the PEP proposes to be *retroactive* >> back to the 3.1 release, i.e. the "frozen" version of the language is >> the state in which it was released as 3.1. > > I'm obviously +1 for this. > > I think one thing to decide is how long the moratorium is in effect. > As of right now the PEP's abstract says for "at least two years", Yeah, I changed that from Jesse's and your "not to exceed two years". > which taking into account the release schedule Benjamin is proposing > and assuming acceptance at the end of the year puts us at roughly the > release of Python 3.3. Should we just say this will be in affect until > development is open for Python 3.4? I like the actual time limit, because it doesn't allow the backdoor of releasing 3.4 early. I'm fine with saying the moratorium effectively ends after 3.3 is released. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
