On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> But str still has some value in py3k: it protects users from >>> accumulated rounded errors produced by arithmetic operations: >> [...] >> >> I know, but this is much more questionable now. [...] > > Would it be out of the question to make str = repr in 3.2, do you think?
I don't think it is out of the question. (Though it would probably break a few more doctests.) I'd like to hear other voices. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
