On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Nick Coghlan<ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Peter Moody wrote: >> If there are any more suggestions on the PEP or the code, please let me know. > > I noticed the new paragraphs on the IPv4 vs IPv6 types not being > comparable - is there a canonical ordering for mixed address lists > defined anywhere (e.g. an RFC)? > > If there is, then it should be possible to implement that on BaseIP and > BaseNet so that comparisons work as canonically defined. If there isn't, > then that should be mentioned in the PEP as the reason why the PEP > deliberately isn't trying to invent a convention.
updated the pep with more information about this. working through changes/issues brought up by David and Martin. Cheers, /peter > Cheers, > Nick. > > -- > Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia > --------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-dev%40hda3.com > _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
