On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Paul Moore<p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/7/3 Tarek Ziadé <ziade.ta...@gmail.com>: >> 2009/7/3 Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com>: >>> Does this sound sensible? Tarek, would you be OK with me attempting to >>> modify your prototype to support this protocol? Are there any tests >>> for PEP 376, so that I can confirm I haven't completely broken >>> something? If I can, I'll knock up some simple prototype importers for >>> non-standard examples, and see how they work with all this. >> >> Yes that's exactly what I was thinking about after the discussion we >> had in the other thread. This change would allow much more flexibility. > > One important note - I plan on using the fact that DistributionDirMap > is not public, and hacking it about drastically, or possibly even > removing it. (After all, the likes of the load method don't make sense > when you've got sys.meta_path, sys.path_importer_cache and the like to > consider). > > If the loss of any of the "internal" classes is an issue, say so now!
Go for it please, and let me know if you set a bitbucket account, so you can push your commits in there directly > > Paul. > -- Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
