Aahz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> After Hrvoje's message, let me rephrase my suggestion. Let's instead allow: >> open(..., sync_on="close") >> open(..., sync_on="flush") >> >> with a default of None meaning no implicit syncs. > > That looks good, though I'd prefer using named constants rather than > strings.
I would agree, but where do you put them? Since open is a built-in, where would you suggest placing such constants (assuming we don't want to pollute the built-in namespace)? -- Scott Dial sc...@scottdial.com scod...@cs.indiana.edu _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
