-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Feb 13, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:

Amen. I can see two scenarios where we might release 3.0.2: (a) if we
find a really severe error in 3.0.1 (or perhaps a security problem);
(b) if 3.1 ends up getting delayed severely.

In case (a) happens it's okay if the 3.0 branch is left alone until
the time we need to make that one patch. The probability of (b) is
low, so let's worry about that when it happens, and let's try not to
make it happen. :-)

That's more than fine with me! :)

Barry

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)

iQCVAwUBSZbVYnEjvBPtnXfVAQKVxgP+NFpKibfYS5cjk68H/ImTYydGX82skFzP
vtKNEvJeYdLg+WCpC88W9mL8jqBiG4yyKIXXF2hlVkX74tZbR3FU+V1EbXSvC46d
rO5ZzFWMaVW/qrxepeY2tAiUCr82CVD1b6W8E0IAms7UjUKBPS9n2fYKsWOGEQph
1pLbdp7CBek=
=j0yP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to