On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:51 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Why was this test disabled, rather than fixed? That seems a rather
>> poor solution to the problem of it taking longer than desired to run.
>
> I disabled it because I didn't know how to fix it, and created bug
> reports 2968 and 2969 in return.

So you did. I didn't notice them, sorry.

> It is policy that tests that break
> get disabled, rather than keeping them broken.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to