2008/6/1 Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> The case for String has already been made.
>
> Actually I'm not sure. One you know that isinstance(x, String) is
> true, what can you assume you can do with x?
[...]
> Right. I'm now beginning to wonder what exactly you're after here --
> saying that something is an "X" without saying anything about an API
> isn't very useful. You need to have at least *some* API to be able to
> do anything with that knowledge.
Apologies to Raymond if I'm putting words into his mouth, but I think
it's more about *not* doing things with the type - a String is a
Sequence that we don't wish to iterate through (in the flatten case),
so the code winds up looking like
for elem in seq:
if isinstance(elem, Sequence) and not isinstance(elem, String):
recurse into the element
else:
deal with the element as atomic
This implies that other "empty" abstract types aren't useful, though,
as they are not subclasses of anything else...
Paul.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
