On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Curt Hagenlocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Ralf Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I've tracked it down to this change:
> > http://hgpy.de/py/release25-maint/rev/e9446c6ab3cd
> > this is svn revision 61009.
> > [...]
> > self._rbufsize if 1, and so the code reads one byte at a time
>
> The change is correct, but exposes a flaw earlier in the same method.
> "_rbufsize == 1" represents a request to buffer "by line", which is
> clearly irrelevant in this context.  A request to read n bytes should
> just use the default buffer size if buffering "by line".  Sample patch
> is attached.
>

Sorry to reply on the mailing list. But this change is wrong.
e.g. if you're using a buffer size of 16 bytes and try to read 256 bytes, it
should call recv with a value of 256 and not call recv 16 times with a value
of 16.
However, there should be an upper limit (as shown by the imap bug).

Regards,
- Ralf
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to