Christian Heimes wrote: > Greg Ewing wrote: >> __uberglobal__ > > Since Python 3.0 supports all unicode chars I vote for __überglobal__.
Make it untypeable to most Americans so as to discourage use? If that's what we're going for, I suggest the somewhat more self-documenting and less impossible __the_dictionary_where_all_the_builtins_are_now__. Seriously, though, I really liked __universal__. It's part of a theme: local < global < universal, and it communicates itself well. __root__ and its ilk don't bring anything concrete to mind, just abstract trees. I don't think of namespaces as trees when I'm coding a function - they're more like layers or overlays at that level. So, a +0.01 from me (after weighting for lurkerhood) for __universal__. Neil _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
