[Raymond Hettinger]
>>> * Add a pure python named_tuple class to the collections module.
>>> I've been using the class for about a year and found that it greatly
>>> improves the usability of tuples as records.
>>> http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/500261
[Delaney, Timothy]
> Hmm - possibilities. "record" definitely has greater connotations of
> heterogeneous elements than "tuple", which would put paid to the
> constant arguments that "a tuple is really just an immutable list".
No need to go so widely off-track. The idea is to have an efficient type that
is directly substitutable for tuples but is a bit more self-descriptive. I
like
to have the doctest result cast at NamedTuple('TestResults failed attempted).
The repr of that result looks like TestResult(failed=0, attempted=15) but is
still accessible as a tuple and passes easily into other functions that expect
a
tuple. This sort of thing would be handly for things like os.stat().
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/500261
Raymond
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
