Greg Ewing wrote:
> Michael O'Keefe wrote:
>
>> I'd like to see a built-in shorthand to allow me to
>> chain method calls even when a method call does not explicity
>> return a reference to the instance of the object (self).
>>
>
>
>> def newFunc02():
>> return NewList([8,9,7,1]).self_('sort').self_('reverse').self_('pop',0)
>>
>
> My thought is that you're trying to write programs
> in some other language using Python.
>
> If you really want all that on one line, you can
> do it already:
>
> x = NewList([8,9,7,1]); x.sort(); x.reverse(); return x.pop(0)
>
> which is just as compact and doesn't suffer from
> the weirdness of passing method names in as quoted
> strings.
>
You could write a metaclass which decorates all methods in a class. Any
methods which return None could return self instead.
Michael
> --
> Greg
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
