On 8 Dec 2006, at 16:38, Josiah Carlson wrote: > My statement in the email you replied to above was to say that if we > wanted it to return a group, then we could include subsequent .group > (0) > with the same semantics as the original match object.
And my reply was simply to point out that that's not workable. > At this point it doesn't matter, Frederik will produce what he > wants to > produce, and I'm sure most of us will be happy with the outcome. > Those > that are unhappy will need to write their own patch or deal with being > unhappy. I believe I've already conceded that twice. Kind regards, Alastair. -- http://alastairs-place.net _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
