On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 10:43:22 +0200, "\"Martin v. Löwis\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>People can use [-U] to improve the Unicode support in the Python standard >library. When they find that something doesn't work, they can study the >problem, and ponder possible solutions. Then, they can contribute >patches. -U has worked fine for me in the past, I contributed various >patches to make it work better. It hasn't failed for me at all. I guess it makes more sense as a development tool to work on zero-dependency tools like the standard library. Still, -Q has both a __future__ import and a command-line option, why not -U? _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
