On 6/19/06, Benji York <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ah, do the union of the coverage! Yeah, that would be nice and give the most accurate coverage data in terms of what is actually being tested. But as Titus says in another email, question is how to get that data sent back to be correlated against.
-BrettBrett Cannon wrote:
> But it does seem accurate; random checking of some modules that got high
> but not perfect covereage all seem to be instances where dependency
> injection would be required to get the tests to work since they were
> based on platform-specific things.
> I don't know if we need it hooked into the buildbots (unless it is dirt
> cheap to generate the report).
It would be interesting to combine the coverage over several platforms
and report that.
Ah, do the union of the coverage! Yeah, that would be nice and give the most accurate coverage data in terms of what is actually being tested. But as Titus says in another email, question is how to get that data sent back to be correlated against.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
