On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:47:43AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Ross> I wrote an epoll implementation which can be used as a drop-in > Ross> replacement for parts of the select module > ... > Ross> Is there any interest in incorporating this into the standard > Ross> python distribution? > > Without going to the trouble of downloading epoll (always an adventure with > SourceForget), can you explain what epoll does, how it's better than (parts > of) select, how widely it's used and how stable it is?
Sure, I can provide a short version of what's on this page: http://www.kegel.com/c10k.html epoll is a replacement for the standard poll() system call. It's available on Linux, introduced sometime during the 2.5 development series. Whereas poll requires that an fd list be maintained in userspace and handed in on every call, epoll maintains that list in the kernel and provides (de)registration functions for individual fds. This prevents the kernel from having to scan potentially thousands of file descriptors for each call to discover only a handful which had activity. Oddly enough, the interface to the poll call in the python select module much more closely resembles the design of epoll (kudos to whoever designed that). This code has undergone some testing with both codeville and BitTorrent, but I'm not going to claim it's seen as much testing as it should. The NeedForSpeed wiki lists /dev/epoll as a goal for the twisted folks. I assume that the naming here is either confusion with the Solaris /dev/poll or that it refers to the initial implementation of epoll, which I believe used a device file. Either way, this would give them that support for free, as well as everyone else. Ross _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
