On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:00:21PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > And the parenthetical comment was completely backwards and should have read: > > (This means that all context managers are contexts, but not all contexts > are > context managers). > > The reason for recommending that context managers should be contexts is > similar to the reason that iterators should be iterables - so that doing > the __context__() call manually will still give you something that can be > used in a with statement.
So the intention is to enable something like: ctx = lock.__context__() with ctx: ... Which works as long as people don't try to use the context in two nested 'with' statements. Fair enough. I don't think I'll suggest doing this in the "What's New", though. :) --amk _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com