Greg Ewing wrote: > I don't quite see the point here. Inside a bytes object, > they would be stored 1 byte per byte. Nobody is suggesting > that they would take up more than that just because > a_bytes_object[i] happens to return an int.
Speaking of which, I suspect it'll be a lot more common to need integer objects in the full range [0, 255] than it is now. Perhaps we should extend the pre-allocated integer objects to cover the full byte range. Tim Delaney _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
