On Wed, 1 Sep 2021, 7:18 am Senthil Kumaran, <sent...@uthcode.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 8:57 AM Angus Hollands <goose...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Should look more like >> ```python >> x = np.array(...) >> y = x[2 < x < 8] >> ``` >> Is there any interest in pushing this PEP along? >> > > My personal opinion is, it is worth discussing again. I could see the > benefits this brings to Numpy Arrays. > The PEP itself was deferred based on boolean overload dislike than the > short-circuit or chaining operator preference. > While I don't plan to reactivate these PEPs myself, I'd be happy to welcome a co-author that was keen to champion them (535 doesn't stand alone - it depends on the "binary if" and "binary else" circuit breaking protocol proposal in 532). While I believe 535 is mostly OK, 532 needs some updates to account for: * the new language grammar (the PEP was written before the switch to pegen) * the walrus operator (some of the possible future extensions mentioned are irrelevant now) * fixing the diagram rendering and ReST mark up Cheers, Nick. > -- > Senthil > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/ENJYFXADZXDU7RZBD5RJTPS6ZE7YFNMN/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/QY2FL7PMW6OBU24UFDQVPEJLOHZVQUPO/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
