On 5 Sep 2020 Ram Rachum <r...@rachum.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Sorry if this was proposed already. I looked here
> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0622/#alternatives-for-constant-value-pattern,
> search for "idea to make lookup semantics the default". I saw that a few
> symbols like $ and ? were proposed, and I thought that maybe the annotation
> syntax -> could indicate a capture expression, like so:
> 
>    case x:
>        match Point(-> a, -> b):
>            ...
>        match -> whatever:
>            do_something(whatever)
> 
> I like the arrow because it's easy to imagine the value "entering" the
> variable. What do you think?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Ram.


Nice! :)

Combined with keywords that could become:
        Point(x -> a, y -> b)

or, mixed with providing values:
        Point(x -> a, y=42)

And we wouldn’t need
        match -> whatever:
because we already have x, and if x is an expression I’d prefer
        case x as whatever:
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/AFTPEB5R2JMGVLIOOYDCGMMX2QNSTAWJ/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to