On 5 Sep 2020 Ram Rachum <r...@rachum.com> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Sorry if this was proposed already. I looked here > https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0622/#alternatives-for-constant-value-pattern, > search for "idea to make lookup semantics the default". I saw that a few > symbols like $ and ? were proposed, and I thought that maybe the annotation > syntax -> could indicate a capture expression, like so: > > case x: > match Point(-> a, -> b): > ... > match -> whatever: > do_something(whatever) > > I like the arrow because it's easy to imagine the value "entering" the > variable. What do you think? > > > Thanks, > Ram.
Nice! :) Combined with keywords that could become: Point(x -> a, y -> b) or, mixed with providing values: Point(x -> a, y=42) And we wouldn’t need match -> whatever: because we already have x, and if x is an expression I’d prefer case x as whatever: _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/AFTPEB5R2JMGVLIOOYDCGMMX2QNSTAWJ/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/