On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 6:49 PM Raymond Hettinger < raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > it is hard to make a decision between the pros and cons, > > when the pros are in a single formal document and the > > cons are scattered across the internet. > > Mark, I support your idea. It is natural for PEP authors to not fully > articulate the voices of opposition or counter-proposals. > The current process doesn't make it likely that a balanced document is > created for decision making purposes. > > On some PEPs in the past I seem to recall we've had the PEP author, or at least editor after the initial draft kicked things off _not_ be among those invested in seeing the PEP be approved. Or maybe I'm conflating the old role of the PEP delegate with the editor? Regardless i don't see how an anti-pep would work much better, but I also don't see anything stopping anyone from trying one. I worry that it'll fragment conversation even more and separate discussions so that everyone is even more confused about overall opinion tallies? one way to find out... -gps
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/JYJ2GB2LKX7ELWKURAQMOA7Z52DHE3B6/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
