Guido van Rossum wrote:
> PEP 338 - support -m for modules in packages. I believe Nick Coghlan
> is close to implementing this. I'm fine with accepting it.
I just checked in a new version of PEP 338 that cleans up the approach so that
it provides support for any PEP 302 compliant packaging mechanism as well as
normal filesystem packages.
I've started a new thread for the discussion:
PEP 338 - Executing Modules as Scripts
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
