On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 7:55 AM Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be> wrote:
> On 2019-05-29 16:00, Christian Heimes wrote: > > You could add a check to PyType_Ready() and have it either return an > > error or fix tp_call. > > Yes, but the question is: which of these two alternatives? I would vote > for fixing tp_call but Petr voted for an error. > I also vote for the error so that people are sure they get the semantics they want/expect. If not defining tp_call is a reasonable thing then I would expect it to never have to be set to begin with and that doesn't sound like what anyone wants if we're talking about automatically filling it.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
