On 2/5/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After so many attempts to come up with an alternative for lambda, > perhaps we should admit defeat. I've not had the time to follow the > most recent rounds, but I propose that we keep lambda, so as to stop > wasting everybody's talent and time on an impossible quest.
+1 The recently suggested keyword change, from lambda to expr (as in '''expr x, y: x+y''') looks like an improvement to me, but I suspect opening up the possibility of a keyword change would simply restart all the discussions... (Nevertheless, I'd be +1 on lambda being renamed to expr, if it was an option). Paul. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
