The "data:" scheme would be a good one. Bill
> Barry Warsaw wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 21:43 +0100, Thomas Wouters wrote: > > > >> I don't believe this belongs in 2.4, since it can, actually, break code. > >> Code that depends on the current situation, _TestCase__attributename. > >> Fragile code, to be sure, but still. If there were a compelling reason to > >> backport, I guess it could be hacked to work right-ish, but subclassing > >> TestCase in this way, while convenient, isn't important enough to warrant > >> this (IMHO). > > > > Exactly right. > > You're right. Next time I'm going to decide in favor of not backporting. > I reverted both checkins, this and the urlparse one. > > > For 2.5, this would be a good opportunity to add additional schemes > to urlparse. Candidates? > > Georg > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/janssen%40parc.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
