Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/4/05, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just realized that keeping RuntimeError still does not resolve the > issue that the name kind of sucks for realizing intrinsically that it > is for quick-and-dirty exceptions (or am I the only one who thinks > this?). Should we toss in a subclass called SimpleError?
Much Python code I've looked at uses ValueError for this purpose. Would adding a special exception add much utility? Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://pyropus.ca/software/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
