Guido van Rossum wrote: > On 6/17/05, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>IIRC, there was a decision to not implement phase C and to keep the >>trailing L in representations of long integers. > For 2.x, yes. I'm fine with marking it as Final and adding this to PEP > 3000 instead.
Since PEP 313 has been rejected, the trailing L no longer introduces ambiguity in the representation of roman(40) vs. roman(10L). --Scott David Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com