Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 6/17/05, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>IIRC, there was a decision to not implement phase C and to keep the
>>trailing L in representations of long integers.
> For 2.x, yes. I'm fine with marking it as Final and adding this to PEP
> 3000 instead.

Since PEP 313 has been rejected, the trailing L no longer introduces
ambiguity in the representation of roman(40) vs. roman(10L).

--Scott David Daniels
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to