Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Steven Bethard]
>> I have a feeling that it might actually be easier to continue to
>> document try/except and try/finally separately and then just give the
>> semantics of try/except/finally in terms of the other semantics. Take
>> a look at the Java Language Specification[1] (pages 399-401) if you
>> want to see how nastly documenting try/except/finally can get. And
>> they don't even have an else clause! ;-)
>
> Fine with me.
>
> Can I go ahead and approve this now
While I see the cost of this PEP being pretty small, I see the benefit
the same way too.
> before someone proposes to add a new keyword?
Heh.
Cheers,
mwh
--
If i don't understand lisp, it would be wise to not bray about
how lisp is stupid or otherwise criticize, because my stupidity
would be archived and open for all in the know to see.
-- Xah, comp.lang.lisp
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
