Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment: Yes, writing portable tests turns out to be tricky; I also don't want to write tests based on int that'll fail when/if Py_ssize_t is substituted.
Applied the patch (with a couple of minor changes) in r81045 through r81048. I'll open another issue for the int->Py_ssize_t changes. Thanks again for the patch! ---------- assignee: -> mark.dickinson resolution: -> fixed stage: unit test needed -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8674> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
