Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment: Applied in r72479, r72481, r72482, r72483.
As a side note, I'm not 100% convinced of the correctness of the resource_setrlimit code. If rlim_t is smaller than an unsigned long then input values might be wrapped to a smaller value (by the implicit long -> rlim_t conversion) when they should be signaling OverflowError instead. Perhaps there should be a bunch of PySAFE_DOWNCASTs here? Or maybe rlim_t is never smaller than a long in practice. About RLIM_INFINITY: I can't find it documented anywhere that RLIM_INFINITY is (rlim_t)-1, though I dare say that's true on many platforms. Still, it doesn't seem like a safe assumption. ---------- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue5933> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
