New submission from Eric Martin <[email protected]>:
Run on a MacBook Pro (15-inch, 2019)
2.3 GHz 8-Core Intel Core i9
16 GB 2400 MHz DDR4
Python 3.8.7 (default, Dec 24 2020, 19:07:18)
[Clang 12.0.0 (clang-1200.0.32.27)] on darwin
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from timeit import timeit
>>> S = set(range(10_000))
>>> timeit('S.remove(5000); S.add(5000)', globals=globals(), number=100_000)
0.01933291699999984
$ python3.9
Python 3.9.1 (default, Dec 8 2020, 13:10:53)
[Clang 12.0.0 (clang-1200.0.32.27)] on darwin
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from timeit import timeit
>>> S = set(range(10_000))
>>> timeit('S.remove(5000); S.add(5000)', globals=globals(), number=100_000)
3.8517225489999998
----------
components: Interpreter Core
messages: 386815
nosy: eamartin
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Operations on sets more than hundred times less efficient with python3.9
than with previous versions
type: performance
versions: Python 3.9
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43198>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
