Ken Jin <[email protected]> added the comment:
Sorry for intruding, but I thought I'd offer some rudimentary, non-scientific
benchmarks for this:
[MSC v.1928 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 # a debug build of python, no compiler
optimizations
import timeit
# gen comp
timeit.timeit("''.join(str(_) for _ in range(1000))", number=10000)
11.154560299999957
# list comp
timeit.timeit("''.join([str(_) for _ in range(1000)])", number=10000)
9.987510899999961
The list comp is slightly faster than the gen comp. Interestingly, if one were
to use python -m timeit instead, the gen comp would show better results since
it has a better 'best of 5' timing. IMO, total time is a more accurate
representation than best of 5 since the latter gets skewed by outliers.
----------
nosy: +kj
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42699>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
