Irit Katriel <[email protected]> added the comment:
The PEP that Raymond linked to says:
"Further smarts could have been added to the comparison mechanism, but this
limited set of allowed "swaps" was chosen because it doesn't require the
infrastructure to do any processing (negation) of return values. The choice of
six special methods was made over a single (e.g. __richcmp__) method to allow
the dispatching on the opcode to be performed at the level of the C
implementation rather than the user-defined method."
The pseudo code you suggested assumes that the results of comparisons can be
interpreted as booleans, which not always correct and makes your suggestion
under-specified. It is not easy to devise a sound and intuitive composition of
boolean expressions whose semantics are user-defined.
As an aside, I think for the boolean case it is enough that one of them is not
NotImplemented, so your pseudo code should have been:
def __le__(self, other):
result_1 = self.__lt__(other)
result_2 = self.__eq__(other)
if result_1 is NotImplemented and result_2 is NotImplemented:
return NotImplemented
return result_1 or result_2
----------
nosy: +iritkatriel
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39862>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
