Martin v. Löwis <mar...@v.loewis.de> added the comment: > Ah, I think I'm beginning to understand. Thanks for the explanation. So, > if I understand correctly, I should refactor the patch and just remove all > of the Py_off_t and just use off_t because the standard says that *is* the > type. Correct?
Correct. _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4681> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
