Silas S. Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Sorry, I accidentally posted the workaround code instead of the bug example. This is what I should have posted:
setting1 = "val1" setting2 = "val2" def dummy(): global setting1 def f(x): exec(x) return setting1,setting2 print f("setting1='new' ; setting2='new'") Expected result: ('new', 'new') Actual result: ('val1', 'new') The presence of "global setting1" in a different function effectively stops a shadowed setting1 from being created by the exec. Workaround: Add a real assignment before the exec, i.e.: def f(x): setting1 = 0 exec(x) return setting1, setting2 or do the exec in a dictionary instead of in the current scope, i.e.: def f(x): d ={"setting1":setting1,"setting2":setting2} exec(x) in d return d['setting1'], d['setting2'] Observed in: Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, May 18 2007, 16:56:43) on Cygwin Python 2.5.2 on 2.6.26-gentoo-r1 (by Christopher Faylor http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2008-11/msg00168.html ) Not observed in: Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Aug 1 2008, 00:32:16) on SUSE Linux Python 2.4.4 (#2, Apr 17 2008, 01:58:28) (Debian etch, ARM) Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jul 31 2008, 17:31:22) (Ubuntu) _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4315> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com