New submission from Antony Lee:
The following example, which raises a KeyError, shows that in a
WeakKeyDictionary subclass that defines __missing__, that method doesn't get
called.
from weakref import WeakKeyDictionary
class WeakKeyDictionaryWithMissing(WeakKeyDictionary):
__missing__ = lambda: print("hello")
class C: pass
d = WeakKeyDictionaryWithMissing()
d[C()]
This behavior is technically OK, as object.__missing__ is only documented in
the datamodel to be called for dict subclasses, and WeakKeyDictionary is
actually not a subclass of dict, but of MutableMapping.
Still, it would seem preferable if either WeakKeyDictionary did use
__missing__, or perhaps, more reasonably, Mapping.__getitem__ did so. (Or, at
least, if the WeakKeyDictionary class clearly stated that it does not inherit
from dict. Note that the docs start with "Mapping class that references keys
weakly. Entries in the *dictionary* etc." (emphasis mine))
----------
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 300671
nosy: Antony.Lee
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: WeakKeyDictionary/Mapping doesn't call __missing__
versions: Python 3.6, Python 3.7
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue31254>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
