Éric Araujo <mer...@netwok.org> added the comment: > I agree that all table entries should link to the entry in the same file. This is fixed in 3.2 and 3.3, with a bit of reST kludgery. I’ll backport to 2.7 if there is no negative feedback.
> range() definitely needs a forward reference to 4.6 sequence types > bool() lacks forward references; it could have one to 4.2 Bool ops and 4.11.9 > Bool values I have added links in a subsequent commit. > object() -- no where to go. > type(n,b,d) has no forward references as there is no where to go exactly I think this deserves another report. > slice() only has a reference to the glossary; it has no entry in Ch.4. "Slice > objects have > read-only data attributes start, stop and step which merely return the > argument values (or > their default). They have no other explicit functionality" is slightly wrong > since there > is the .indices method. Ditto. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12298> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
