Jesse Noller <[email protected]> added the comment: On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: > > Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> added the comment: > > Speaking of which, I wonder why we have both multiprocessing.Pool and > concurrent.futures.ProcessPoolExecutor. They seem to fill the exact same > needs, with different APIs... >
Brian and I need to work on the consolidation we intend(ed) to occur as people got comfortable with the APIs. My eventual goal is to remove anything but the basic multiprocessing.Process/Queue stuff out of MP and into concurrent.* and support threading backends for it. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <[email protected]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9205> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
