On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:11, Hans-Peter Jansen <h...@urpla.net> wrote: > On Friday 18 February 2011, 14:00:29 Richard D. Moores wrote: >> Thanks, Andres and christophe, I found the errata. >> >> BTW I'm new here. > > Hello. Arriving here is always a sign of good taste ;-)
Or good luck? >> Is this list bottom posting or top posting? > > Most users, that use sane tools get this right, but we don't punish the > others. Due to this lists topic, mobile readers will only be a very > small subset (where top posting has a [less questionable] value). So bottom posting. Good. > BTW, I tend to prefer reply to list only, since this list is easily > manageable volumewise. Hm. I'm used to the Tutor list (tu...@python.org), where even if you reply to several subscribers AND the list, everyone receives only one copy. So that's not the case here? >> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 04:33, Andres Reyes <armo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Look in http://www.qtrac.eu/pyqtbook-errata.html >> > >> > 2011/2/18 Richard D. Moores <rdmoo...@gmail.com> >> > >> >> I'm just about to start learning PyQt with the 1st printing of >> >> _Rapid GUI Programming with Python and Qt_. Is there a list of >> >> errata somewhere? > > Again, good choice. I'm sure, you will enjoy reading it. Marks books > raised my reference level for technical writings. I've been learning Python 3 with his _Programming in Python 3_ (2nd ed.) for some time now. The book also makes for a good reference, with all those perfectly designed tables. For example, the 3-page table of string methods on pp. 73-75. > OTOH, that resulted > in forcing me to bear up more pain on reading much less qualified > material.. Ha! Dick _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
