The reason I have BaseView inheriting from QAbstractItemView is because inside it I make calls like:
self.setItemDelegate(...) self.setDragEnabled(...) self.setEditTriggers(...) and so on. These are all things that are common to both MyTreeView/MyTableView, and obviously wouldn't work if BaseView had no base class. Any ideas of a better way to achieve this without duplicating code between the 2 views? Thanks On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Andreas Pakulat <ap...@gmx.de> wrote: > On 22.02.10 19:45:31, Jugdish wrote: > > I have my own subclasses of QTreeView and QTableView, called MyTableView > and > > MyTreeView. There is a lot of code that is common between my 2 classes, > so > > to avoid having tons of duplicate code, I was thinking of having a base > > class derived from QAbstractItemView that they both derive from. > > This is not possible. All three Qt classes are subclasses of QObject > which doesn't support inheriting from it multiply (directly or > indirectly). You may get undefined behaviour wrt. Qt signal/slots and > who knows what else. However, nothing stops you from not having a base > class for your BaseView at all. > > Andreas > > -- > A long-forgotten loved one will appear soon. > > Buy the negatives at any price. > _______________________________________________ > PyQt mailing list PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com > http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt >
_______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
