On 5/13/2008 2:43 PM, Phil Thompson wrote:
Let me think about this a bit more. My problem wasn't with the single installer in itself, it was the big static build which is too inflexible and getting more difficult to create.
My own concerns is about having PyQt and Qt installed within different directories. The question list was meant to show how many questions could be raised and how much confusion can be created by dividing Qt from PyQt. All those questions ceased when you merged the two together, and I'd hope we won't go back there.
I'm instead totally agnostic whether to build it as a single static _qt.pyd or with .pyd + Qt's .dll files. The former gives you a much smaller installer file which might be a feature; the latter gives more flexibility to final users. Either way it's fine.
-- Giovanni Bajo Develer S.r.l. http://www.develer.com _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
