On Thursday 02 March 2006 3:43 pm, Sundance wrote: > On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:58:18PM +0000, Phil Thompson wrote: > > What you describe can be implemented, but it means that the Qt module > > must be linked against the Core and Gui Qt libraries. > > Oookay, you've lost me there. I thought that, with the exception of > convertFromPlainText(), escape() and mightBeRichText() (which you can > implement as part of QtGui all you want, since they're defined in > QTextDocument anyway), the Qt namespace only contained enums? What am I > missing here? Does the way PyQt works absolutely requires that the > enums would be the exact C++ type that the library uses, rather than, > you know, just ints...?
It's the functions you mention - their namespace is Qt not QTextDocument. They are defined in the file qtextdocument.cpp but that's irrelevant. Having a namespace convention for enums and a different one for functions and classes isn't acceptable. Phil _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list PyKDE@mats.imk.fraunhofer.de http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
