Using RTTI sounds like a better idea. Cleaner, more cpp like. Thanks, Phil.
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 10:10, Phil Thompson wrote: > On Wednesday 24 September 2003 6:04 pm, Patrick Stinson wrote: > > in progression: > > > > Does the %ConvertToSubClassCode directive require some sort of class > > identification mechanism to be written into the original cpp library > > code? QEvent returns an enumerated value in type(), as well ass > > QApplication and some others, and QObject has QObject::className() that > > returns a string identifier. that can be used in conjuction with > > sipMapStringToClass() and a sipStringTypeClassMap struct. > > Yes, although sipMapStringToClass() is just a helper for when the RTTI is a > string. sipMapIntToClass() exists as well, or you can do something entirely > different with your own code. > > > Does this mean I have to modify my cpp library to add some sort of class > > identifier for classs/subclasses if I want polymorphic return values in > > my python functions? > > Or use the standard C++ RTTI stuff. > > Phil > > _______________________________________________ > PyKDE mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
