Thanks for the info Simon.
Would mixing up static ("old-way") and dynamic ("new-way") bindings be ok
(I only intend to use the "old-way" bindings to get the "set_list" thing
working).
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Simon Feltman <[email protected]> wrote:
> It looks like the set_list method is not being included with the
> introspection bindings for gconf. Both in regards to
> GConf.Client.set_list and GConf.Value.set_list and therefor it does
> not look like you can work around it by constructing a Value list
> manually and using that with "Client.set". I found this bug in
> bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681433
>
> -Simon
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Ajay Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Simon.
> >
> > Following is the program, where I have put code-snippets for the
> "new-way",
> > and "old-way" to persist a list-type.
> >
> >
> >
> #################################################################################################
> >
> > # NEW-WAY
> > from gi.repository import GConf
> >
> > client = GConf.Client.get_default()
> > new_value = ['one', 'two', 'three']
> > client.set_list('/random/strings', GConf.ValueType.STRING, new_value)
> >
> >
> >
> > """
> > # OLD-WAY
> > import gconf
> >
> > client = gconf.client_get_default()
> > new_value = ['four', 'five', 'six']
> > client.set_list('/random/strings', gconf.VALUE_STRING, new_value)
> > """
> >
> >
> #################################################################################################
> >
> >
> >
> > Running the "new-way" code, gives the following exception ::
> >
> >
> ************************************************************************************************
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "kk.py", line 6, in <module>
> > client.set_list('/random/strings', GConf.ValueType.STRING, new_value)
> >
> ************************************************************************************************
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > whereas the "old-way" code snippet runs fine, and persists the list fine.
> >
> >
> > Please let me know if any other info is required.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Simon Feltman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Ajay,
> >> Please post a pared down example of code illustrating the problem.
> >> Preferably something small enough we can copy and paste into a python
> >> console. If it is an obvious bug or limitation which is easily
> >> reproduced, feel free to file a bug report here:
> >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org under Bindings/pygobject
> >>
> >> -Simon
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Ajay Garg <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> > Hi all.
> >> >
> >> > I have been porting some code, from gconf to gi.repository.GConf;
> there
> >> > I am
> >> > able to "set" values of all types, except of the type
> >> > "GConf.ValueType.LIST".
> >> >
> >> > I will be grateful if someone could let me know how to do this :) I am
> >> > going
> >> > a little impatient over this.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Ajay
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > pygtk mailing list [email protected]
> >> > http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
> >> > Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://faq.pygtk.org/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ajay
> >
>
Regards,
Ajay
_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list [email protected]
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://faq.pygtk.org/
