Am 07.05.2011 06:39, schrieb Jason Heeris:
On 7 May 2011 03:24, Neil Muller<[email protected]> wrote:
On 6 May 2011 21:07, Jason Heeris<[email protected]> wrote:
Storing the object in a hidden column is fine, and what I assumed you
were doing originally.
Hah! Okay then, now that it's morning, I can't believe that didn't
occur to me :P
While we're on the topic though, it strikes me as more sensible to
simply put the objects themselves in a ListStore without manually
extracting the information for the other columns (ie. so the ListStore
just contains one column, which is displayed in different ways). Is
there a way to tell each TreeViewColumn to, say, "look at column zero,
take the x.fit.param_A attribute, format it using "0x%03X and display
it in a CellRendererText" — and then so on for each attribute, each
describing to a different view of the same column?
Have a look at gtk.TreeViewColumn.set_cell_data_func:
http://faq.pygtk.org/index.py?req=show&file=faq13.024.htp
Cheers,
Jason
_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list [email protected]
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://faq.pygtk.org/
_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list [email protected]
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://faq.pygtk.org/
