I agree, the new graphic of the pygtk reference (as well as the new gtk reference) is a finger in the eye, terrible indeed.
Cheers, Giuseppe. On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Jason Heeris <[email protected]>wrote: > I'd like to offer some criticism of the new format of the "PyGTK 2.0 > Reference Manual" at http://developer.gnome.org/pygtk/stable/ > > I use this reference all the time, but the recent changes make it > extremely difficult to use — primarily the fact that the table of > contents (which is to me the most important navigational tool for the > reference) is squashed up on the right hand side. The fact that it is > next to acres of empty space (below the list of examples) that it > could otherwise fill is also a little odd. > > I notice that it's only on the front page that the TOC is even > visible, making it seem even more perverse that it's so hard to use :) > > Would it be possible to move it back into the centre of the page, and > maybe add more differentiation between the node titles and their > description — possibly making it not a wall of traffic-cone orange > text? I'd suggest: keep the orange for the node titles, but render the > descriptions in the grey used for body text. > > If someone tells me what to submit changes against, I'd be happy to > look into it myself. > > Cheers, > Jason > _______________________________________________ > pygtk mailing list [email protected] > http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk > Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://faq.pygtk.org/
_______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [email protected] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://faq.pygtk.org/
