ok, so you advice that every instance of the app would have his own server
(this is the only way any independent instance can listen and control the
window in shared memory)



On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Pietro Battiston 
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Il giorno gio, 31/03/2011 alle 20.27 +0200, Pietro Battiston ha scritto:
> > Il giorno gio, 31/03/2011 alle 20.01 +0200, Giuseppe Penone ha scritto:
> > >
> > >         (Assuming that indeed there's no way of using sockets in a
> > >         non-blocking
> > >         fashion - I'm totally ignorant about that) maybe having a
> > >         little process
> > >         created with multiprocessing would be simpler & more portable,
> > >         for you,
> > >         than using threading? I guess a single one is sufficient, so
> > >         the
> > >         overhead shouldn't be significant, even on Windows. Then, at
> > >         every
> > >         iteration of the main loop, the main process could check, from
> > >         a shared
> > >         Value (or Array), if there's something to open.
> > >
> > >         (untested, sorry if I wrote something stupid)
> > >
> > > Hi Pietro,
> > > the problem of having a single and independent process dedicated to
> > > the job of server is that the server would not be able to rise a
> > > minimized/hidden window as consequence of the situation "a new file
> > > open starts (user double click) unaware that the same file is already
> > > opened".
> >
> >
> > The server should not, that would be the job of the main process...
> >
> > User: "Hey, program, open that file"
> > Main process1: starts, spawns the server through the multiprocessing
> > module
> > Server1: "Hey, main process, there is no open instance, have fun"
> > Main process1: "thanks", opens the file in a new window
> >
> > later...
> >
> > User: "Hey, program, open that file"
> > Main process2: starts, spawns the server through the multiprocessing
> > module
> > Server2: "hey, Main process2, there is an already open instance!"
> > Main process2: "OK, tell it to open that file!"
> > Server2: "Server1, could you please tell you friend Main process to open
> > that file?"
> > Server1: "Sure, Server2!"
> > (Main process2 & Server2 exit)
> > Server1: "Hey, Main process2,
>
> Sorry Server1, but that's Main process1.
>
> Pietro
>
> _______________________________________________
> pygtk mailing list   [email protected]
> http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
> Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://faq.pygtk.org/
>
_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list   [email protected]
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://faq.pygtk.org/

Reply via email to