On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 09:22, Rafael Villar Burke (Pachi) <[email protected]> wrote: > Alex Dedul wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Any news on porting pygtk to python 3 ? I would be glad to help maybe >> almost full-time on this. Just would be good to know current status on >> this matters first.. And if none projects or initiatives were already >> started on this - is to okay then to just clone git repo and start >> hacking ? Any things i better do before that like to notify some >> people about this or the like ? >> > AFAIK, the expected way to support python 3.x is through > gobject-introspection generated bindings. > > If you want to help pushing forward python 3 support then, IMHO, it > would be a good idea to help with the pybank and pygobject introspection > work. This last project was mentioned on the mailing list some days ago. > You should read the "[pygtk] introspection pygobject branch" thread > starting on the 13rd of october this year for more information and > pending tasks and try to contact the people working on it. > > Regards, and thanks for helping,
Yes, having introspection support means we don't have to port the existing static bindings, making the move to 3.0 (and maybe pypy?) more doable. Some info: http://live.gnome.org/PyGObject http://live.gnome.org/PyGI All help is welcome. Regards, Tomeu _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [email protected] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://faq.pygtk.org/
