Hi there, Alex Roitman wrote: > On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 22:12 -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote: >> Alex Roitman wrote: >>> Are there any plans to switch to LGPLv3 any time soon? >>> >> We're already licensed under LGPL v2 or later, what would be the >> benefits of changing to only v3 (or later)? > > I have no idea, I would like to know if you guys are planning > it or not, for whatever reasons you may have. > >> You can already take the code and relicense it yourself under LGPLv3 if >> you wish. > > Yes, I know. > We (the GRAMPS project) are based on pygtk. So if gtk and pygtk > go LGPL3 we would probably also go GPL3. Otherwise, even though > we could stay "GPL2 or later", we would effectively be GPL3 > once there's no LGPL2-pygtk around. > > If you're not planning to switch to LGPL3 then we can technically > stay GPL2 or later.
Isn't it possible to use LGPL 2 libraries with GPL 3 programs? And LGPL 3 libraries with GPL 2 programs? Sorry for being OT and lazy, if you have a GPL FAQ pointer, throw it at me. - Felix
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [email protected] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
