Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 12:07:00PM +0000, Philippe Collet wrote:Philippe, it's great having some more people wrapping libraries like crazy!. But remember that there's ongoing work to add introspection capabilities to gobject, and it would make bindings mostly automatic.
I'm a beginner in the wrapping process.
I'm trying to create a wrapper to use gtksheet with pygtk.
First question would be: why not work on GtkGrid, which /has/ a wrapperThis is indeed a great suggestion. Philippe, would you dare to have a look to GtkGrid? It could eventually get into gtk+ itself and the problem would be solved at its root.
and will probably be less work to adapt?
If you're willing to hack on it here you have some additional information:
GtkGrid design document and comments thread on gtk+ mailing list: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2004-April/msg00137.html
Some more comments on gnome-db ML about inclusion in gtk+: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-db-list/2004-April/msg00048.html
Gtk+ team meeting where gtkgrid is mentioned: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2004-April/msg00130.html
Isn't it a nice and promising project to work on? ;) Regards,
Pachi
_______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [email protected] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
